What is the White House Conference on Aging (WHCOA) … Really.
Is it a serious examination of the problems facing older Americans that occurs once every decade, or is it a public relations opportunity?
At its fourth regional forum on Monday, the WHCOA held a panel discussion on retirement security that featured a panel of bureaucrats who failed to even mention age discrimination. That’s like talking about California’s drought without mentioning climate change. A spokesperson for the Obama administration promised the President would protect Social Security and said the administration is working to make the process of retirement savings easier and more transparent. No one is asking why so many older Americans are poor and struggling
Numerous attempts in recent months to contact Nora Super, executive director of the WHCOA, to urge her to address employment discrimination based on age have failed to elicit any response whatsoever. Why does the WHCOA seems to be focusing upon soft issues like “healthy aging.”
On its web site, the AARP says it is “co-sponsoring” and “co-planning” the WHCOA’s regional forums, along with a lobbying group called Leadership Council of Aging (LCAO), which describes itself as a coalition of 72 of the nation’s leading organizations serving older Americans. The contact person for “all questions” regarding the LCAO is Nicholas Barracca at LCAO@aarp.org. I emailed that address on Monday and received an unsigned reply stating that the AARP is the “current chair organization” of the LCAO, which rotates chairs each year among five different organizations. I inquired again about the LCAO’s source of funding and Barracca replied that the LCAO is funded through membership dues.
At some point, it is fair to ask whether there is a conflict of interest with respect to the AARP’s dominating role in the WHOA forums.
Continue reading “THE AARP’S ROLE IN WHITE HOUSE CONF. ON AGING”
Silicon Valley has been an unapologetic apartheid state for young workers for years but this could be about to change.
A class action age discrimination lawsuit was filed against Google, Inc. on April 22 by software engineer Robert Heath who was interviewed but not hired for a position at Google in 2011 when he was 60-years-of-age. The lawsuit alleges Google has demonstrated a pattern and practice of violating the Age Discrimination in Employment and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act.
According to the lawsuit, Google’s workforce is “grossly disproportionate” with respect to age. The lawsuit asserts the median age of the 28,000 employees who worked for Google in 2013 was 29. Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Labor reports the median age for computer programmers in the United States is 42.8 and the median age for software developers is 40.6. According to the lawsuit, Google had 53,000 employees in 2014 and revenues of approximately $66 billion.
Google’s position with respect to age discrimination is completely inexplicable. The company last year made a public commitment to increase race and gender diversity in its workforce, and released workforce statistics relating to those characteristics. But Google was completely silent with respect to age and did not release age-related statistics. It was as if Google’s position was that age is not a factor in workforce diversity.
Continue reading “GOOGLE HIT WITH CLASS ACTION AGE DISCRIM. LAWSUIT”
It is one thing to restrict participation in a youth soccer league to youth but what justification exists for restricting participation in an intellectual challenge on the basis of age?
Next City, a non-profit organization that receives funding from some ofAmerica’s major foundations, is hosting a gathering on May 6-7 in my city of residence, Reno, Nevada, that will feature “the top urban innovators, 40 years old and younger, working to make change in cities.” According to the press release, Next City’s annual Vanguard Conference is “a chance for the brightest urban thinkers from the America’s to prototype a design intervention that, if successful, could be replicated elsewhere.” The conference,“Big Idea Challenge, Reno 2015,” is being co-sponsored by the city of Reno.
You don’t have to be a bright urban thinker to recognize that this kind of event sends a negative message to people who are aged 41 and older. They are made to feel like “other,” “lesser” and “yesterday.” Why? There is no evidence that America’s brightest urban thinkers are aged 40 and under. Continue reading “NEW BIG IDEA CHALLENGE: STOP AGE DISCRIMINATION”
An interesting societal shift seems to have pushed age (70 and above) into the undesirable position of the most negative characteristic for a political candidate.
A Pew Research Center poll last year found that 55 percent of Americans said it would make no difference to them if the candidate was in his or her 70s. But 66 percent of Americans said it would make no difference to them if a candidate was gay or lesbian and 71 percent said it would make no difference if the candidate were female. Thus, it makes more difference to the public if candidates are in their 70s than if they are gay or lesbian or female.
At the same time, 36 percent of those polled said it was less likely that they would support a candidate in their 70s, compared to 27 percent who would be less likely to support candidates who are gay or lesbian and nine percent who are less likely to support female candidates. So more Americans – of all ages – are less willing to vote for politicians in their 70s than they are for gay and lesbian and female candidates. Continue reading “AGE TAKES THE LEAD AS A NEGATIVE IN POLITICS”
Senator Marco Rubio, the 43-year-old Republican from Florida, began his campaign for the American presidency this week with a calculated and divisive generational attack.
He implies that America’s 77 million baby boomers are “yesterday” and states the time has come for a new generation to lead America.
In his campaign launch speech, Rubio stated:
- “Now, the time has come for our generation to lead the way toward a new American Century … “
- “This election … is a generational choice about what kind of country we will be ….”:
- “Just yesterday, a leader from yesterday began a campaign for President by promising to take us back to yesterday. But yesterday is over, and we are never going back.”
Can you imagine Hilary Clinton, 67, or Jeb Bush, 62, starting their presidential campaigns by alienating younger generations and encouraging Americans to vote for them on the basis of age? Such is the nature of age discrimination, and Rubio knows it. Continue reading “MARCO RUBIO’S DIVISIVE GENERATIONAL POLITICS”
The White House Conference on Aging (WHCOA) issued its first “policy brief” Friday afternoon, addressing the issue of “healthy aging.”
Get ready for news of a truly momentous policy announcement – The Conference is urging a “shift in the way we think and talk about aging. Rather than focusing on the limitations of aging, older adults across the nation want to focus instead on the opportunities of aging.” Oh, and older adults should get physical activity, good nutrition and good medical care.
No, this is not an April fools joke. With all of the problems facing older Americans, the Obama administration essentially wants us all to think happy thoughts.
Meanwhile, the WHCOA has completely ignored calls to address the problem of age discrimination in employment, which, among other things, condemns older workers to a retirement of poverty or near poverty.
According to a 2013 study by Economic Policy Institute, nearly half (48.0 percent) of the elderly population is “economically vulnerable,” defined as having an income that is less than two times the supplemental poverty threshold. This equates to roughly 19.9 million economically vulnerable seniors. Women and minorities have far higher rates of economic vulnerability. Continue reading “OBAMA’S POLICY ON AGING – BE POSITIVE!”
The AARP has been conducting surveys for years showing the existence of epidemic age discrimination in the American workplace and it released yet another one on Monday.
But the AARP seems unwilling to take a position on why the problem of unemployment and under-employment exists for older workers and what to do about it. Although the AARP markets itself as the nation’s leading advocate for Americans age 50 and older, it’s advocacy on this issue has been virtually non-existent. One can’t help but wonder if the AARP’s reticence reflects greater concern for its $3 billion a year profit-making enterprise selling health and travel insurance to retirees than the plight of older workers.
In my recent book, Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace, I indisputably show that older workers have virtually no protection against age discrimination in the workplace. This is a problem that has been getting worse for fifty years. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 was weak to begin with and has been eviscerated by the U.S. Supreme Court. I propose repealing the ADEA and making age a protected class under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to insure that older workers receive the same level of protection as workers who are subject to illegal discrimination on the basis of race, sex, national origin and religion. All employment discrimination is based on irrational animus and unfounded stereotypes. There is absolutely no justification for treating older workers differently and, in fact, it is completely contrary to the bedrock principle of U.S. Constitutional that insures all Americans receive equal justice under the law.
Why isn’t the AARP lobbying Congress to provide equal justice for older workers? The AARP surveys generate a lot of wonderful free publicity for the AARP, which makes it appear that the AARP is actually doing something. But the reality is that no one is doing anything about the problem of age discrimination in the workplace, which reached crisis proportions during the Great Recession and is still wreaking havoc on older workers lives. Even the White House Conference on Aging refuses to acknowledge the issue, preferring instead to partner with t he AARP to address “healthy aging.” Continue reading “THE AARP: SURVEYS BUT NO SOLUTIONS”